Working Papers
Feb 23, 2021
6
Minutes read

Classification of Information Disorder

Authors
Gregory Ho Wai Son
Emir Izat Abdul Rashid
Emir Izat Abdul Rashid
Key Takeaways
Data Sets Overview
This paper approaches the classification of information disorder by studying tweets regarding a specific COVID-19 patient that was the subject of widespread public discussion in Malaysia in early 2020. The paper examines the subtleties and problems associated with characterizing Information Disorder in the context of human assessments. Moreover, the paper also explores whether computational approaches can be employed to aid with the classification of Information Disorder. This paper discusses several policy considerations in an 'all of society' approach to combating Information Disorder – (1) Government – Principles of objective fact-checking, (2) Corporations – Civic responsibilities of handling Information Disorder and (3) Society – Digital and Online Media Literacy.
classification-of-information-disorder
Working Papers
Preliminary papers sharing early-stage research, concepts, or findings. These papers highlight areas of current inquiry and are often precursors to more developed Discussion Papers or Reports.
Disclaimer
As we transition to a digital-first communication and continue building our knowledge hub, publications released before October 2025 are preserved in their original format. Publications released from October 2025 onward adopt a new, digitally friendly format for easier online reading. The official versions of earlier publications, including their original language and formatting, remain available in the downloadable PDF.
  • This paper approaches the classification of information disorder by studying tweets regarding a specific COVID-19 patient that was the subject of widespread public discussion in Malaysia in early 2020.
  • The paper examines the subtleties and problems associated with characterizing Information Disorder in the context of human assessments. Moreover, the paper also explores whether computational approaches can be employed to aid with the classification of Information Disorder.
  • This paper discusses several policy considerations in an “all of society” approach to combating Information Disorder – (1) Government – Principles of objective fact-checking, (2) Corporations – Civic responsibilities of handling Information Disorder and (3) Society – Digital and Online Media Literacy.

Read Full Publication

Article highlight

featured report

Conclusion

Attributes
Footnotes
References
Photography Credit

Featured

KRI shares insightful commentaries on current topics to encourage discussion, but these do not represent KRI's official views.
No news & event found in this category
You can browse other sections or return to the homepage.

Related to this Publication

No results found for this selection
You can  try another search to see more

Related to

Technology, Digitalisation & Future Proofing

Discussion Papers
Jan 28, 2026

Assessing and Optimising MyDigital ID

Launched in 2023, MyDigital ID enables Malaysians to access multiple government and selected private digital services using a single verified login. As a Single Sign On (SSO) platform, it simplifies access, reduces repeated verification and supports more efficient delivery of digital services. These practical benefits make authentication a sensible and appropriate starting point for a national digital identity initiative. International experience shows that many digital identity systems begin with authentication and develop gradually over time. In several countries, SSO has served as a foundation on which additional capabilities were introduced after governance arrangements, safeguards and public confidence were well established. In this respect, MyDigital ID’s current focus does not limit future options. Rather, it provides immediate value while preserving flexibility for future policy choices that align with national priorities. This research finds that MyDigital ID is progressing positively as a secure and reliable authentication platform within Malaysia’s broader digitalisation agenda. Its technical design aligns with recognised security standards, while its role as a verification layer that relies on authoritative government databases supports both system integrity and privacy protection. As adoption increases and integration expands, continued attention to governance clarity, accessibility and long-term planning can further strengthen public understanding and confidence in the system. Viewed in this way, MyDigital ID can be understood as a public digital asset that delivers immediate service improvements while remaining adaptable to future needs. A measured and phased approach allows benefits to be realised today, while ensuring that policy choices remain aligned with institutional readiness and public expectations.

Want more stories like these in your inbox?

Stay ahead with KRI, sign up for research updates, events, and more

Thanks for subscribing. Your first KRI newsletter will arrive soon—filled with fresh insights and research you can trust.

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Follow Us On Our Socials